| From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory W Burnham <gburnham(at)sfu(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem? |
| Date: | 1999-02-01 13:26:09 |
| Message-ID: | 36B5AB71.ACBA1716@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
> Ok, I've seen all the xinv* files, I understand that. But what
> if the benefit of using large objects over files? If there isn't
> superior performance then why do it?
To provide a consistant access interface in a client-server environment.
Managing one interface is usually easier than managing several (e.g.
postgres, html, ftp, ...) to support a single app.
I would expect the performance of LOs to be somewhat worse than direct
file system access to the same data, for a variety of reasons. But for
many applications that performance difference is not a critical issue.
- Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory W Burnham | 1999-02-01 13:28:12 | Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem? |
| Previous Message | Gregory W Burnham | 1999-02-01 12:01:21 | Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem? |