| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... |
| Date: | 1999-01-30 11:47:52 |
| Message-ID: | 36B2F168.E1C5FDAF@trust.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Vadim Mikheev wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Handling of SELECT FOR UPDATE OF > 1 relations is ever more
> > > complex. While processing tuples (more than 1 tuple may be
> > > returned by join) from child plan P1 created for tuple of table
> >
> > I don't think Informix allows FOR UPDATE in a multi-table select.
>
> Oracle does. I don't know about SyBase, DB2 etc.
> In any case - this is implemented already -:)
>
When MS Access came out they made a big fuss about this ability,
claiming that they were the first ones to implement this.
I'm not sure in what category they claimed they were first ;)
-------------------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dr. Ernst Molitor | 1999-01-30 12:40:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Problems with anon CVS? |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 1999-01-30 11:44:17 | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick |