Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code
Date: 1999-01-29 06:17:54
Message-ID: 36B15292.3DD68C96@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The basic question is whether this is the proper way to do temp
> tables.

I haven't looked at the patches, but fwiw I would have tried it about
the same way. No need to touch pg_class if the info is
session-specific...

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 1999-01-29 06:35:53 Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed)
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-01-29 03:06:24 Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed)