Re: New VACUUM FULL

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New VACUUM FULL
Date: 2009-12-05 00:49:05
Message-ID: 36AB7B96-3698-4B56-A39D-D96E493DC59E@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Dec 4, 2009, at 18:07 , Jeff Davis wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 18:36 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Let's check it works before worrying about performance. We can take
>> tests out as well as add them once it becomes obvious its working.
>
> Itagaki-san, perhaps you should add a variety of tests, and then Simon
> can remove extra tests after he's convinced that it works.
>
> I tested a variety of situations during my review, and everything
> worked
> as I expected.

Would there be a way for you to package the scenarios you tested into
a suite?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-12-05 00:51:58 Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-12-05 00:42:16 Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management