From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bill Studenmund <wrstuden(at)netbsd(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support |
Date: | 2001-11-13 21:40:34 |
Message-ID: | 3695.1005687634@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bill Studenmund <wrstuden(at)netbsd(dot)org> writes:
> Still checking on a good auto-detect.
ISTM that autoconf should be capable of figuring out which version of
kerberos libraries we have --- that sort of discrepancy is exactly
what it's designed to handle.
>> Kerberos APIs --- for example, the krb5_recvauth man pages I can find on
>> the net describe several more parameters than our code is expecting to
>> pass.
> For krb5_recvauth()? We are using the right function signature...
According to whom? I found
http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/General/CC/kerberos/krb5api/krb5api4.html
in which krb5_recvauth doesn't agree with our code. (I miscounted
yesterday, there's only one more parameter described than we pass,
but it's definitely not the same.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-11-13 22:08:29 | Re: [ODBC] MD5 support for ODBC |
Previous Message | Liam Stewart | 2001-11-13 21:26:59 | Re: absolute() error with jdbc7.1-1.2 |