From: | Goran Thyni <goran(at)kirra(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) |
Date: | 1999-01-02 00:29:14 |
Message-ID: | 368D685A.9CFAA65E@kirra.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jan 1999, Goran Thyni wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I vote against it. Maybe nice to have as an extra, but the base
> > > protocol seems to work well, and is fast.
> >
> > You are right,
> > let me rephrase myself:
> > - the "base protocol" might become obsolite if and when we have
> > a better object base alternative (CORBA and/or XML).
> > - this might be the case for v. 7.0 or later.
>
> Okay, we have to sides to the coin here...Bruce, who feels that our
> current protocol is both good and fast, and you, who wants to replace it
> :)
>
> My question is simple...what benefit is gained by replacing current
> protocol? And, what cons?
>
> Replacing something is great, if there is a reason...what is that reason
> and how does that improve us?
Marc,
The pros, IMHO:
* XML interfaces better to the object model of pgsql itself
* XML interfaces better to XML-viewer, like next generation of
web browsers.
With a little imagination we can at some point in the future forget
about making clients for the databases, just point your webbrowser
at the serverport a make both SELECTs (displays) and INSERT/UPDATE
(forms) with a few lines of javascript.
The con:
* We have a good stable protocol but a little simplistic.
Anything new is not as good until it has matured.
Thus I not suggesting replacing it until we have something
better, sound resonable?
mvh,
--
-----------------
Göran Thyni
This is Penguin Country. On a quiet night you can hear Windows NT
reboot!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-01-02 01:01:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-01-01 23:48:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: XML (was: 2 patches) |