Re: dynloader.h missing in prebuilt package for Windows?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Olson, Ken" <Ken(dot)Olson(at)pega(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Subject: Re: dynloader.h missing in prebuilt package for Windows?
Date: 2016-01-03 14:57:05
Message-ID: 368765E0-87EE-4DF4-B87D-02BB814C1ED8@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 31, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:50:13AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:57:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>>> Oops. Once this patch is applied, it is only going to take effect when
>>>> someone _installs_ Postgres. Even an initdb will not add the file.
>>>> This means that upgrading to the next minor release will _not_ fix this.
>>>
>>> Uh, what? Surely an upgrade to a new package *would* fix it, because
>>> that is a reinstall at the filesystem level. This patch has nothing
>>> to do with system catalog contents, which is what initdb would be
>>> concerned with.
>>
>> Uh, do we install hew lib files and stuff in a minor upgrade? I guess
>> we do, yeah.
>
> Let's hold this for 9.5.1 and all minor releases will get it at the same
> time.

I vote for going ahead with this at once. It seems low risk, and having 9.5.1 install different files from 9.5.0 seems like an unnecessary annoyance.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2016-01-03 15:34:53 Re: Avoiding pin scan during btree vacuum
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2016-01-03 13:26:44 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2