Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] TODO list elements
Date: 1998-12-14 08:03:12
Message-ID: 3674C640.A3122596@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> > And note - this will be not row level locking, but
> > multi-version concurrency control.
> >
>
> What does it mean ?
> LLL in 6.5 doesn't include row level locking ?

One systems (Informix, Sybase) use locking for concurrency control,
another ones (Oracle, Interbase) use multi-versioning for this.
I'm implementing multi-version concurrency control.

Vadim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 1998-12-14 09:13:14 RE: [GENERAL] TODO list elements
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 1998-12-14 01:51:08 RE: [GENERAL] TODO list elements

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-12-14 08:07:30 nabstime.c changes...
Previous Message Constantin Teodorescu 1998-12-14 07:34:48 Re: [INTERFACES] RE: [HACKERS] libpq and libpgtcl in Windows