Re: seperate swap drive, was Re: [ADMIN] Speed problem

Marc,

I'm running PostgreSQL v. 6.3.2. No I don't want to disable fsync just
in case someone stops a process midstream (which has happened before-- I
figure it could screw up the db). So maybe it is those "memory leaks"
that you've suggested. I'll try closing and re-connecting to see if
there are any differences. However, I would be interested in downloading
v. 6.4. Do you know where to get it? (I think it is a beta version but I
couldn't find it on the www site).

Thanks.
-Tony Reina

p.s. Does 6.4 have page-level locking?

The Hermit Hacker wrote:

>
> Are you running with fsync() disabled?
>
> What version of PostgreSQL are you running? v6.4 has several
> memory leak fixes in it, which may or may not help...on long term
> connections, memory leak *may* be attributing to your problem. If you run
> top while doing the 'update/inserts', does the process size just continue
> to rise?
>
> Something else to try...close and reconnect your insert/update
> process(es). Not a long term solution, just curious if that shows an
> overall speed improvement. Similar to the 'memory leak' problem, at least
> this will let go of the process, clean out the memory, and start over
> again....
>
> Marc G. Fournier
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org