Re: shared memory release following failed lock acquirement.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared memory release following failed lock acquirement.
Date: 2004-09-29 21:45:42
Message-ID: 3641.1096494342@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Does this mean that the parameter max_locks_per_transaction isn't honoured
> at all, it is just used to size the lock table

Yes, and that's how it's documented.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-09-29 21:48:47 Re: shared memory release following failed lock acquirement.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-09-29 16:18:53 Re: FAQ translation in farsi