Re: rint() replacement

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: rint() replacement
Date: 2003-05-10 02:32:48
Message-ID: 3639.1052533968@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hardly worth the trouble. The substitute implementation is small
>> and portable...

> Sorry, my paragraph was bad. Should I remove cbrt or move it to /port?

I'd leave it sit as-is. I don't think it's worth fooling with.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-05-10 03:08:38 Re: Static snapshot data
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-10 02:10:51 Re: rint() replacement