Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC.

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC.
Date: 1998-10-27 17:20:48
Message-ID: 363600F0.E9E9BE12@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Tom, I'm thinking of putting a "LDFLAGS_ODBC" into the port-specific
> > Makefile,
> I suspect that some such hackery will be necessary on almost every
> platform. Maybe you should put LDFLAGS_ODBC into the template files
> instead of the port makefiles?

Yes, that's what I meant...

> Anyway, I'd suggest making all of the LDFLAGS_SL assignments in
> Makefile.shlib be += rather than :=, and then the Makefile for the
> ODBC driver can add on the LDFLAGS_ODBC from wherever we decide to
> get them. Are there any other hacks besides setting more flags that
> we are likely to need?

Actually, I don't know why the Makefile.shlib needs anything
platform-specific other than perhaps helping with the naming conventions
for libraries. If the LDFLAGS_SL was in the platform template then
Makefile.shlib wouldn't need anything in that regard, right?

> Are there any other hacks besides setting more flags that
> we are likely to need?

Don't know. That's why they are hacks :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-10-27 17:23:38 Re: [HACKERS] make install fails in perl5 ...
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-10-27 17:15:05 Re: casting money type to float