Re: Linux Oracle! (fwd)

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Good <tomg(at)nrnet(dot)org>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Linux Oracle! (fwd)
Date: 1998-07-21 16:33:47
Message-ID: 35B4C2EB.59FA191C@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Thomas - get a load of this...I argued with these guys for 2
> years. And now when PostgreSQL makes it irrelevant, they port.

Well, it will be interesting to see how they do. They can't beat us on
price, and don't have a particularly open interface, but it might be fun
to try to interoperate with them...

> "In the last couple of weeks, there's been this huge groundswell for
> Linux," the representative said.

Two weeks??!(at)??

> A version of Oracle8 for Linux on the Intel platform is planned for
> shipment by March 1999. Support for other hardware platforms is likely
> to follow.

If they hold true to form, they will announce now and take three years
to actually port the full features from their current product. Oracle,
at least as of 4 years ago, was the _worst_ company I've seen for
vaporware and misleading product information. They did a demo at work
(JPL) for their new product set running on three separate platforms.
Pretty neat, eh? Except that it turned out that _none_ of the products
running on any one of the platforms was available on the other platforms
in the demo. Forms on a Windows machine, db on a Sun, something else on
a Mac, and no current product available for all three. Pretty slimy
salesmanship :(

- Tom

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-07-21 16:36:08 Re: Complexity of contrib types
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-07-21 16:33:22 Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1