Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, ssimkovi(at)rainbow(dot)studorg(dot)tuwien(dot)ac(dot)at
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release
Date: 1998-04-16 13:47:40
Message-ID: 35360BFC.3C2C78DE@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > My question is, "Do we disable the HAVING clause for 6.3.2?" The
> > bugs are serious and cause crashes.
> > Do we disable it?
> Yes...but disabling means that it *will not* be available until
> v6.4...no v6.3.3 :)

Hmm. What is the downside to leaving it in with caveats or "stay away"
warnings in the release notes? Since it didn't exist as a feature
before, the only downside I see is somewhat increased traffic on the
questions list...

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-04-16 13:53:53 Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-04-16 13:19:24 Re: [HACKERS] Division by Zero