Re: cvs ETA?

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cvs ETA?
Date: 2003-06-09 09:39:48
Message-ID: 35186.199.90.235.43.1055165988.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


It's what I tried to use over the weekend, so I could start on a doc patch
... restoring it would probably help a number of people.

andrew

Marc wrote:
>
> ?? cvs itself has been working for ages now ... anoncvs isn't ... or
> is that what you are using?
>
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> Is there any ETA for cvs?
>>
>> Dave

In response to

  • Re: cvs ETA? at 2003-06-08 13:33:03 from The Hermit Hacker

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2003-06-09 10:41:05 Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2003-06-09 09:00:41 Re: Groups and roles