Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date: 2010-02-25 20:03:44
Message-ID: 34d269d41002251203n1ac711d1u74e58da215f76e0e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:59, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:
> Just don't break anything in 9.0 that relies on plperl please. :) To that
> end, let me know when HEAD has something somewhat stable, and I'll
> run some tests against it (e.g. Bucardo, which uses lots of plperl)

Defiantly, the goal is to not break anything :).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-02-25 20:11:00 Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-02-25 20:01:24 Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)