Re: [HACKERS] common area

From: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] common area
Date: 1998-02-27 16:02:02
Message-ID: 34F6E37A.452C69E9@sable.krasnoyarsk.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > Oracle:
> > I needed 24 seconds and 1937 microseconds for the insert test.
> > I needed 1 seconds and 600641 microseconds for the selection&projection test.
> > I needed 1 seconds and 703673 microseconds for the join test.
> > I needed 2 seconds and 404709 microseconds for the update test.
> >
> > PostgreSQL with -F:
> > I needed 10 seconds and 297716 microseconds for the insert test.
> > I needed 28 seconds and 964208 microseconds for the selection&projection test.
> > I needed 83 seconds and 931762 microseconds for the join test.
> > I needed 0 seconds and 588390 microseconds for the update test.
>
> This seems strange. Is a vacuum being done so the optimizer knows how
> large each table is?

You're right, Bruce. I don't see VACUUM in Michael' programm.
This also affects the second test (selection&projection): during
select backend updates data pages to set commit/abort statuses
for tuples' xactions.

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Meskes, Michael 1998-02-27 16:04:15 RE: [HACKERS] common area
Previous Message Michael Meskes 1998-02-27 15:54:52 Re: [HACKERS] common area