Re: [HACKERS] results of regression tests: NetBSD/i386 v1.3

From: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Brook Milligan <brook(at)trillium(dot)nmsu(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] results of regression tests: NetBSD/i386 v1.3
Date: 1998-02-18 13:22:14
Message-ID: 34EAE085.9867CF61@sable.krasnoyarsk.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
>
> > Do they illustrate platform-specific bugs? If not, then we all can use
> > our own platforms for these examples.
> >
> > I'm not sure how I would recognize platform-specific bugs since I only
> > have one platform. In the past I've ignored them, but I just thought
> > this might be the time to point out problems that need attention in
> > case they are something unusual.
> >
> > Diffs from the expected output yield things like:
> > <snip>
>
> These are typical platform-specific differences, and are expected. The last few
> examples are from the trigger tests, which are going to be revisited before v6.3
> release by Vadim (I hope :).

Results are the same as in 6.2.1 expected. So, I just put 6.2.1 expected
into 6.3 expected (with WARN: --> ERROR: translation). Should be ok now.
Let's know if not.

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim B. Mikheev 1998-02-18 13:38:55 Re: [HACKERS] Subselects and NOTs
Previous Message Andrew Martin 1998-02-18 13:03:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] v6.3 release ToDo list and supported p