| From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: TOAST table names |
| Date: | 2006-12-13 12:15:46 |
| Message-ID: | 3418974f9d7c97f1c5a501b05a517d6e@oopsware.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:29:44 +0000, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Is there a big reason why TOAST tables are called such cryptic names?
>
> e.g. pg_toast.pg_toast_16399
>
> Wouldn't it be more pleasant to have them called the same thing as their
> parent
>
> e.g. pg_toast.<name>_toast
>
Wouldn't you have to include the schema name as well? Considering DBAs
using long identifiers you are likely to hit the maximum identifier
length....
Bernd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-12-13 14:00:16 | Re: psql commandline conninfo |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-12-13 11:45:35 | Re: libpq.a in a universal binary |