Re: Size of tuples

From: "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Ron Johnson" <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Size of tuples
Date: 2006-10-10 17:49:20
Message-ID: 33c6269f0610101049w72453498xaf483d1ffc5159ac@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Awesome - thank you!

Alex

On 10/9/06, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/09/06 19:10, Alex Turner wrote:
> > I have a table whose definition is basically
> >
> > create table foo (
> > a int,
> > b int,
> > c int,
> > d date
> > );
> >
> > and when fully populated, select relpages*8192::long/reltuples from
> > pg_class
> > where relname='foo';
> > gives around 52. Why is it so wide when there are only 4*4=16 bytes of
> > actual data?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ.html#item4.5
>
> 23 row header (no OIDs)
> + 16 your row size
> + 4 page pointer
> --
> 43
>
> I'd guess that the extra 4 bytes is from the null bits, page
> overhead, etc.
>
> - --
> Ron Johnson, Jr.
> Jefferson LA USA
>
> Is "common sense" really valid?
> For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
> whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
> are mud people.
> However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFFKvWNS9HxQb37XmcRAuadAKDTDW3nSap3VutXXZB1vHnAFXMd8QCeIqpc
> vMEiTn+MTBeP6wEkLO3zdwI=
> =VeUp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2006-10-10 17:55:57 more anti-postgresql FUD
Previous Message Karen Hill 2006-10-10 17:33:10 Find out the number of rows returned by refcursor?