Re: Performance with 2 AMD/Opteron 2.6Ghz and 8gig

From: "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Markus Schaber" <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance with 2 AMD/Opteron 2.6Ghz and 8gig
Date: 2006-08-07 20:02:52
Message-ID: 33c6269f0608071302h6429cfcn71074709c5cd53ff@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Although I for one have yet to see a controller that actualy does this (I
believe software RAID on linux doesn't either).

Alex.

On 8/7/06, Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Charles,
>
> Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
> > I've also got a 1U with a 9500SX-4 and 4 drives. I like how the 3Ware
> > card scales there - started with 2 drives and got "drive speed"
> > mirroring. Added two more and most of the bonnie numbers doubled. This
> > is not what I'm used to with the Adaptec SCSI junk.
>
> Well, for sequential reading, you should be able to get double drive
> speed on a 2-disk mirror with a good controller, as it can balance the
> reads among the drives.
>
> Markus
> --
> Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
> Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
>
> Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org
> www.nosoftwarepatents.org
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Saranya Sivakumar 2006-08-07 20:07:40 Re: [PERFORM] 7.3.2 pg_restore very slow
Previous Message Donald C. Sumbry ][ 2006-08-07 19:27:42 Re: High Context-Switches on Linux 8.1.4 Server