Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA raid?

From: Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com" <Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA raid?
Date: 2005-04-14 17:13:41
Message-ID: 33c6269f05041410135875d7c5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I have put together a little head to head performance of a 15k SCSI,
10k SCSI 10K SATA w/TCQ, 10K SATA wo/TCQ and 7.2K SATA drive
comparison at storage review

http://www.storagereview.com/php/benchmark/compare_rtg_2001.php?typeID=10&testbedID=3&osID=4&raidconfigID=1&numDrives=1&devID_0=232&devID_1=40&devID_2=259&devID_3=267&devID_4=261&devID_5=248&devCnt=6

It does illustrate some of the weaknesses of SATA drives, but all in
all the Raptor drives put on a good show.

Alex Turner
netEconomist

On 4/14/05, Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have read a large chunk of this, and I would highly recommend it to
> anyone who has been participating in the drive discussions. It is
> most informative!!
>
> Alex Turner
> netEconomist
>
> On 4/14/05, Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com <Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com> wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > I posted this link under a different thread (the $7k server thread). It is
> > a very good read on why SCSI is better for servers than ATA. I didn't note
> > bias, though it is from a drive manufacturer. YMMV. There is an
> > interesting, though dated appendix on different manufacturers' drive
> > characteristics.
> >
> > http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf
> >
> > Enjoy,
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote on 04/14/2005 09:54:45 AM:
> >
> > >
> > > Our vendor is trying to sell us on an Intel SRCS16 SATA raid controller
> > > instead of the 3ware one.
> > >
> > > Poking around it seems this does come with Linux drivers and there is a
> > > battery backup option. So it doesn't seem to be completely insane.
> > >
> > > Anyone have any experience with these controllers?
> > >
> > > I'm also wondering about whether I'm better off with one of these SATA
> > raid
> > > controllers or just going with SCSI drives.
> > >
> > > --
> > > greg
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> > joining column's datatypes do not match
> >
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PFC 2005-04-14 17:22:19 Re: Foreign key slows down copy/insert
Previous Message Alex Turner 2005-04-14 17:01:30 Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA raid?