Re: index problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>
Cc: Marcin Inkielman <marn(at)wsisiz(dot)edu(dot)pl>, postgres-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: index problem
Date: 2000-06-07 14:11:14
Message-ID: 3374.960387074@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com> writes:
> At 03:00 AM 07-06-2000 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you want to trace through the code to discover exactly how it
>> managed to avoid crashing, go for it --- but it doesn't seem like
>> an especially pressing question from here. To my mind the bug is

> Well for some reason things like these tend to set alarm bells off in my
> head with a blinking "security" sign :).

Well, yeah, which is why I made Marc redo the already-built 7.0.1
tarballs in order to squeeze in the fix. (That last-minute fire drill
might be the reason why 7.0.1 was messed up :-(.) But as long as the
lexer does what it's supposed to do, there's no security issue.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mikeo 2000-06-07 14:14:23 Re: [SQL] oracle rownum equivalent?
Previous Message Mihai Gheorghiu 2000-06-07 14:05:12 Re: Dump