From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: operator exclusion constraints |
Date: | 2009-12-04 17:57:41 |
Message-ID: | 3348AB66-DD81-4A6D-9D54-EE735BB155E0@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 4, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 19:00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> I'm starting to go through this patch now. I thought the consensus
>>>> was to refer to them as just "exclusion constraints"? I'm not
>>>> seeing
>>>> that the word "operator" really adds anything.
>>>
>>> I assume you're referring to the name used in documentation and
>>> error
>>> messages. I didn't see a clear consensus, but the relevant thread is
>>> here:
>>>
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1258227283.708.108.camel@jdavis
>>>
>>> "Exclusion Constraints" is fine with me, as are the other options
>>> listed
>>> in that email.
>
>> Yeah, I don't remember any such consensus either, but it's not a dumb
>> name. I have been idly wondering throughout this process whether we
>> should try to pick a name that conveys the fact that these
>> constraints
>> are inextricably tied to the opclass/index machinery - but I'm not
>> sure it's possible to really give that flavor in a short phrase, or
>> that it's actually important to do so. IOW... "whatever". :-)
>
> Well, unique constraints are tied to the opclass/index machinery too.
>
> Unless there's loud squawks I'm going to exercise committer's
> prerogative and make all the docs and messages just say "exclusion
> constraint".
Go for it. Membership has its privileges. :-)
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-12-04 18:36:44 | Re: New VACUUM FULL |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-12-04 17:56:52 | Re: New VACUUM FULL |