| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>, pggeneral <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Re: microsecond log timestamps |
| Date: | 2001-05-13 15:12:55 |
| Message-ID: | 3346.989766775@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I am opposed to the unreadable, non-standard timestamp format.
I didn't see the point of Ed's arbitrary change in YMD format, but
what's wrong with adding fractional seconds? Our own timestamp code
is willing to format fractional seconds, so we can hardly call it
nonstandard.
> I also don't see the point of microsecond granularity.
What Ed implemented (which is what was in 7.0 and before) is millisecond
resolution, which does seem worthwhile; certainly one-second resolution
is pretty coarse on some machines these days.
I was thinking of keeping the YMD display format the same but otherwise
adopting the patch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-13 15:27:45 | Re: Bug with timestamp !!! |
| Previous Message | Janning Vygen | 2001-05-13 14:30:15 | Re: table inheritance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ed Loehr | 2001-05-13 15:35:28 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: microsecond log timestamps |
| Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-05-13 14:28:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: microsecond log timestamps |