| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: hba load error and silent mode |
| Date: | 2009-08-24 19:27:54 |
| Message-ID: | 3318.1251142074@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 20:51, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> We didn't check HBA validity at startup time before, did we? I would not be
>> surprised to get more complaints now.
Good point.
> We checked some of it, but we check it a whole lot more now.
> +1 for backpatching at least the move of the load_hba call.
OK, in that case I think it's reasonable to backpatch into 8.4.
Attached is my work-in-progress changes to pmdaemonize --- I think
the code is good now, but I need to go say something in the docs.
I haven't moved the load_hba call yet.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/plain | 4.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-08-24 20:13:09 | Re: Bug in date arithmetic |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-08-24 19:27:43 | Re: Bug in date arithmetic |