Re: Opinions Requested - PG API or Abstraction Layer

From: Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com" <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Opinions Requested - PG API or Abstraction Layer
Date: 2004-09-10 13:50:21
Message-ID: 330532b604091006506f8cf672@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-novice

Hello,

My favourite is ADOdb, mainly as it seems to be the fastest of the DB
classes, has solid transaction support, a convenient quoting/escaping
method, and a whole host of other handy features (like generating a
form dropdown with the results of a query for you). Caching queries
on the webserver is also nice, as you don't have to make the
round-trip to the database (like you would with MySQL's caching).

Most importantly is the XML goodies that are with the most current
releases of ADOdb, which allow you to reverse-engineer a schema
dynamically and then make alterations to that schema, and then apply
them to your database again.

Quite impressive.

If you do not like the syntax of ADOdb, then PEAR's DB is my second
recommendation, as it has just about everything you would need out of
a DB class.

-- Mitch

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2004-09-10 14:10:25 Re: Display of text fields
Previous Message Michael Wimmer 2004-09-10 12:57:18 unicode and varchar

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Salerno, Vincent 2004-09-10 14:34:38 Alter session set current_schema
Previous Message operationsengineer1 2004-09-10 09:32:25 Re: Opinions Requested - PG API or Abstraction Layer