Re: Big 7.1 open items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-16 03:43:41
Message-ID: 3264.961127021@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Please add my opinion for naming rule.

> relname/unique_id but need some work new pg_class column,
> no relname change. for unique-id generation filename not relname

Why is a unique ID better than --- or even different from ---
using the relation's OID? It seems pointless to me...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-16 03:57:44 RE: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-16 03:35:21 Re: Big 7.1 open items

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-16 03:57:44 RE: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-16 03:35:21 Re: Big 7.1 open items