Re: Additional supplied modules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Additional supplied modules
Date: 2011-10-13 22:16:47
Message-ID: 3170.1318544207@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> On 10/13/11 6:32 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> Could we somehow categorise these, and also do something to clarify
>> that SPI is a collection of extensions rather than an extension
>> itself?

> Alternately we should clean up SPI and break it out into its separate
> extensions.

I don't feel a need to do that in the source tree, but maybe flattening
the documentation would be worthwhile.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-14 00:00:13 Re: Remove support for 'userlocks'?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-10-13 22:05:45 Re: pl/perl example in the doc no longer works in 9.1