Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche.
Date: 2016-03-25 13:48:43
Message-ID: 31588.1458913723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It's stupid that we keep spending time and energy figuring out which
> shared memory data structures require alignment and which ones don't.
> Let's just align them *all* and be done with it. The memory cost
> shouldn't be more than a few kB.

I think such a proposal should come with a measurement, not just
speculation about what it costs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-03-25 14:11:38 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-25 13:48:00 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-03-25 13:48:49 Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-25 13:48:00 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche.