From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_xlog becomes extremely large during CREATE INDEX |
Date: | 2004-05-15 03:55:34 |
Message-ID: | 3124.1084593334@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> writes:
> "TL" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> TL> ... On looking at the code I see that it doesn't make any
> TL> attempt to prune future log segments after a decrease in
> TL> checkpoint_segments, so if a previous misconfiguration had allowed the
> TL> number of future segments to get really large, that could be the root of
> TL> the issue.
> Wow... that explains it!
> I bumped up checkpoint segments to 50 for a restore since it made it
> run way faster. In normal operation I don't need that many so I
> dropped it back down but it didn't reclaim any space so I figured I
> might as well keep it at 50...
How long did you wait? I believe the code will prune excess segments as
they come around to be recycled. It just doesn't kill them immediately.
I think that part of what's going on in Jeff's example is that he's
looking at the state immediately after a spike in database traffic, and
not having any patience to see if the system will recover after some
period with more-normal traffic levels.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-15 04:23:18 | Re: pg_xlog becomes extremely large during CREATE INDEX |
Previous Message | Ed L. | 2004-05-14 22:51:12 | Re: Identifying diskspace leakage |