Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Yep... and I'm not sure it's actually doing SSL compression, rather than
> compression of the stream *inside* the SSL socket.
Worth noting here is that many/most people have abandoned use of SSL
compression because it is now known to render the stream more
decryptable. I do not know whether that objection also applies to
doing separate compression "inside the socket" as you put it.
regards, tom lane