Re: plpgsql's case bug?

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql's case bug?
Date: 2010-03-28 02:14:10
Message-ID: 3073cc9b1003271914t2c75c8edt708d28beb4d37a40@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
>
> this is based on General Rules case 1 of chapter 13.6 (case statement)
> but i don't think that behaviour is the meaning of that Rule. Even if
> it is, the exception should be: "case not found for case statement"
> and not just "case not found"
>

ah! and this is in the PSM spec BTW

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-03-28 03:44:56 Re: plpgsql's case bug?
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2010-03-28 02:08:01 plpgsql's case bug?