Re: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core)

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core)
Date: 2010-02-22 20:10:15
Message-ID: 3073cc9b1002221210t1c90480cy84b6bc4b5de5cc16@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> I still haven't seen a good reason for not using cron or Task Scheduler
>> or other standard tools.
>>
>
> - marketing? don't you hate when people say: Oracle has it!?

just before someone insult me... this comment was thought about the
in-core scheduler, something we can live without with this and still
doesn't have to hear that

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-02-22 20:15:03 Re: scheduler in core
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2010-02-22 20:08:25 Re: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core)