| From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core) |
| Date: | 2010-02-22 18:59:43 |
| Message-ID: | 3073cc9b1002221059oa200cf3ub7c75b7b7929f688@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> we need those integrated processes at all when in a standby server?
>
> Yes. You might want to run e.g. scheduled reports from a standby
> reporting server, launched by a scheduler process. Or backups.
>
ah! fair enough!
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-02-22 19:00:20 | Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-02-22 18:50:33 | Re: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core) |