Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot standby and synchronous replication status
Date: 2009-08-13 20:19:57
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0908131319m43bd24fes49077556147cfe68@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, that would work.  Although it would probably take as much verbiage
>> to document the utility as it does to document how to do it manually.
>
> Yes, but it would *feel* less hackish to sysadmins and DBAs, and make
> them more confident about moving the xlogs.
>

and is better for marketing... in fact, when i say we need to move
them manually with a symlink sysadmins looks to me like an strange bug
;)

> Getting it to work on windows will be a pita, though ... Andrew?
>

mmm... is there a way to make this *manually* in windows? maybe this
is enough reason for a tool to make it...

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-08-13 21:15:19 Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-08-13 19:24:31 Re: Alpha 1 release notes