| From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Extensions User Design |
| Date: | 2009-06-24 22:13:26 |
| Message-ID: | 3073cc9b0906241513p6693c979ma031823a3cc104e9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Beyond standard extensions, I'm not sure we need a committee to "approve"
> extensions. Does Perl have such an animal? I'm fairly wary of creating new
> decision-making bureaucracies.
>
not "approve", just mark it as something like: "tested with pg vX.XX",
"not ready for production", etc...
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-06-24 22:18:30 | Re: Extensions User Design |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-06-24 22:09:17 | Re: Extensions User Design |