Re: autovacuum not honoring pg_autovacuum in 8.3.5?

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autovacuum not honoring pg_autovacuum in 8.3.5?
Date: 2009-02-13 20:51:38
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0902131251l7933347bqc1eaabc70a611a59@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found this today. Note, auto vacuum has been disabled for this
> relation for a very, very long time. At the very end you will see that
> this relation has been autovacuumed previously as well. We have a manual
> cron to vacuum this table every hour so I am unsure why autovacuum is
> doing what it is doing.
>
> app=# select * from pg_autovacuum where vacrelid = '21474846';
> -[ RECORD 1 ]----+---------
> vacrelid | 21474846
> enabled | f
> vac_base_thresh | 0
> vac_scale_factor | 0
> anl_base_thresh | 0
> anl_scale_factor | 0
> vac_cost_delay | 0
> vac_cost_limit | 0
> freeze_min_age | 0
> freeze_max_age | 0
>

i was bitten for this already... the problem is that you have all
parameters in 0... they should be -1 (specifically max_freeze_age)

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2009-02-13 20:56:42 Re: The science of optimization in practical terms?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-02-13 20:44:46 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf