On 6/17/05, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 14:35:01 +0200,
> Jose Gonzalez Gomez <jgonzalez(dot)openinput(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > The problem comes when you have questions that may be not applicable
> > (8), or optional (doesn't know, doesn't answer) (9). The easy solution
> > would be to have four tables:
> >
> > yes_no
> > yes_no_not_applicable
> > yes_no_optional
> > yes_no_not_applicable_optional
>
> How about having a table with the valid codes for each question?
> This should be relatively easy maintain and you can easily set up
> a foreign key reference to this table to enforce integrity.
>
There would be no problem in doing so with such an easy case, but
think about having a table with cities (hundred, thousands?) and then
have four copies for each of the above posibilities with its related
maintenance nightmare.