Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT
Date: 2019-01-10 17:41:49
Message-ID: 3055.1547142109@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-Jan-10, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> ALTER TABLE ONLY t1 ADD CONSTRAINT uniq_t1_i1_i2 UNIQUE (i1, i2);
>> [ leads to ]
>> Indexes:
>> "uniq_t1_i1_i2" UNIQUE CONSTRAINT, btree (i1, i2) INVALID

> I'm not clear what problem you're reporting. If you use ONLY, then the
> command doesn't cascade to create the index on partitions, and the index
> is marked invalid. If you add the constraint to each partition and
> ALTER INDEX ATTACH PARTITION, the index on t1 should become valid when
> every partition of the table has its index.

I concur that the code is operating as designed. I think however that
there's a user-experience problem here, which is that INVALID suggests
that something's broken. I wonder if we could improve matters by
making psql and the docs describe this state of a partitioned index
as INCOMPLETE.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Pedersen 2019-01-10 17:43:11 Re: BUG #15587: Partitions with ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-01-10 17:38:13 Re: BUG #15577: Query returns different results when executed multiple times