Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Date: 2018-06-03 21:50:20
Message-ID: 30227.1528062620@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The main remaining question I have is what do do with back-branches.
> Shall we back-patch this or not?

Given the behavioral changes involved, I'd say "no way". That's
reinforced by the lack of field complaints; if there were lots of
complaints, maybe we'd be willing to break backwards compatibility,
but ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Berend Tober 2018-06-03 21:54:16 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-06-03 21:47:58 Re: Code of Conduct plan