Re: Postmaster log perms and line suffix

From: jon <jonzou(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Koen Martens" <pgsql(at)metro(dot)cx>
Cc: "Chris Hoover" <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jerry Sievers" <jerry(at)jerrysievers(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postmaster log perms and line suffix
Date: 2006-05-01 19:58:38
Message-ID: 3009c0a80605011258o1f19e968r528624dacf24c91a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

my 2 cents
1 setup logcheck to send message to a public email box
2 use apache to access log file themself

On 5/1/06, Koen Martens <pgsql(at)metro(dot)cx> wrote:
>
> Chris Hoover wrote:
> > On 26 Apr 2006 12:39:26 -0400, *Jerry Sievers* <jerry(at)jerrysievers(dot)com
> > <mailto:jerry(at)jerrysievers(dot)com>> wrote:
> >
> > Pgadmins, 2 loosly related questions
> >
> > 1. We have need to let developers view the postmaster logs on some
> of
> > our environments and wish NOT to give them access to the postgres
> > Unix acct if possible. It looks though as if log file perms are
>
> I would probably use syslog logging for this..
>
> Best,
>
> Koen
>
> --
> K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
> Networking, hosting, embedded systems, unix, artificial intelligence.
> Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
> Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
> can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hogan, James F. Jr. 2006-05-01 21:39:20 Audit Logs, Tables and Triggers using PLTCL
Previous Message Lane Van Ingen 2006-05-01 19:25:19 Re: IO query