| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway), pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: questions on ALTER TABLE ... OWNER |
| Date: | 2002-02-19 20:39:18 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20020220073918.039fab40@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 12:24 19/02/02 -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Currently, ALTER TABLE ... OWNER will change the ownership of a table,
>view, sequence or index -- despite the fact that its name hints that it
Does it automatically alter the ownership of items 'owned' by the table
(eg. PK indexes & serial sequences) when a table owner is altered?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2002-02-19 20:53:04 | Re: pg_dump: use ALTER TABLE for PKs |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-02-19 19:24:59 | Re: questions on ALTER TABLE ... OWNER |