| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ang Chin Han <angch(at)pintoo(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Functions too slow, even with iscachable? |
| Date: | 2000-08-07 09:57:01 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000807195701.02781970@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
At 17:11 7/08/00 +0800, Ang Chin Han wrote:
>
>BTW, pg_dump doesn't seem to preserve the iscachable attribute. Bug?
>
Don't know about the rest of your message, but this seems to be a bug. I'll
look into it some more...
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-08-07 12:12:38 | Re: Functions too slow, even with iscachable? |
| Previous Message | Ang Chin Han | 2000-08-07 09:11:10 | Functions too slow, even with iscachable? |