From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: heap_create with OID? |
Date: | 2000-07-04 09:19:07 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000704191907.020dab70@mail.rhyme.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 02:57 4/07/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> I am wondering if anyone can see an immediate problem in creating a
function:
>> heap_create_oid
>> which is just like heap_create, but takes an oid arg. This oid (assuming
>> it's free) would be used to create the object.
>There's no inherent problem in forcing a particular choice of OID;
>initdb does it on every run. The trick is to avoid a conflict of
>OID assignments.
I've modified the relevant routines up to and including defining
lo_create_oid, and was wondering what the best way to procede in testing
the new routine might be...is there a document that decribes modifying the
standard set of functions and adding lo_create_oid?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Brooke | 2000-07-04 09:38:47 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Re: [HACKERS] proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license |
Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 2000-07-04 08:06:29 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license |