Re: Revisited: Transactions, insert unique.

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>, Joachim Achtzehnter <joachim(at)kraut(dot)bc(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Revisited: Transactions, insert unique.
Date: 2000-04-28 10:16:41
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20000428181641.008ffc20@pop.mecomb.po.my
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 07:35 AM 27-04-2000 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> p.s. Would anyone actually need timeouts of a day (86400) or greater?
>
>Are you asking for sub-second timeout values? If so, we could add that.

No. Was wondering about the other end - timeouts of a day. That would
affect how many bytes to used timeout values.

Cheerio,
Link.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph 2000-04-28 10:33:27 FoxPro Fronted/Performance
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-04-28 10:02:57 Re: Revisited: Transactions, insert unique.