Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>
To: Marten Feldtmann <marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de>, Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
Cc: Elmar(dot)Haneke(at)gmx(dot)de, pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95
Date: 2000-02-23 04:04:42
Message-ID: 3.0.5.32.20000223120442.0084ca00@pop.mecomb.po.my
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 07:07 PM 22-02-2000 +0100, Marten Feldtmann wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 Elmar(dot)Haneke(at)gmx(dot)de wrote:
>>
>> Is there really an interest in spending the extra money for a
>> Windows license to build a less reliable database server?
>>
>
> Hmmm, try to think about an application, which normally runs on a server,
>but then is also wanted (with much less data) on a notebook ...

Erm I got linux running on my notebook. It's got a phone directories on it,
with a web app to access it.

Think about it, you get a server with a 2+ hour UPS, built in portable
console screen.
Even rack mountable with the proper kit ;).

If only notebooks were more reliable, then we could make cool routers out
of them..

Hmm, router with routing tables stored in postgres (multilevel cached of
course for performance) <grin>. Nah.... hehehe.

Cheerio,

Link.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message omid omoomi 2000-02-23 04:37:10 Re: [GENERAL] RestrictionClauseSelectivity
Previous Message Lincoln Yeoh 2000-02-23 03:57:37 Re: [GENERAL] Calender