Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB'" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Date: 2001-05-24 04:42:43
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20010523214243.017aab70@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 11:02 PM 5/23/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Unless we want to abandon MVCC (which I don't), I think an overwriting
>>> smgr is impractical.
>
>> Impractical ? Oracle does it.
>
>Oracle has MVCC?

With restrictions, yes. You didn't know that? Vadim did ...

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-24 04:49:32 Re: DROP CONSTRAINT patch
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-05-24 04:40:20 RE: DROP CONSTRAINT patch