| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-19 00:12:22 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000618171222.011c7af0@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
At 08:08 PM 6/18/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Does your proposal break the smgr abstraction, i.e. does it
>> preclude later efforts to (say) implement an (optional)
>> raw-device storage manager?
>
>Seeing very few want that done, I don't see it as an issue at this
>point.
Sorry, I disagree. There's excuse for breaking existing abstractions
unless there's a compelling reason to do so.
My question should make it clear I was using a raw-device storage
manager as an example. There are other possbilities, like a
many-tables-per-file storage manager.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-19 00:23:58 | int24_ops and int42_ops are bogus |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-19 00:08:07 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-19 00:24:25 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-19 00:08:07 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |