| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-18 23:43:42 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000618164342.011d2450@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
At 06:50 PM 6/18/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>If we eliminate the round-robin idea, what did people think of the rest
>of the ideas?
Why invent new syntax when "create tablespace" is something a lot
of folks will recognize?
And why not use "create table ... using ... "? In other words,
Oracle-compatible for this construct? Sure, Postgres doesn't
have to follow Oraclisms but picking an existing contruct means
at least SOME folks can import a datamodel without having to
edit it.
Does your proposal break the smgr abstraction, i.e. does it
preclude later efforts to (say) implement an (optional)
raw-device storage manager?
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-19 00:08:07 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-18 23:36:59 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-19 00:08:07 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-18 23:36:59 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |